TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML vs PDF From:Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Fri, 8 Aug 1997 14:56:51 +0800
Laurie, this subject has been covered exhaustively (and exhaustingly)
on the list before. It's one of those topics that tends to ignite the
It's a good question, but I suggest you check the recent archives
first ( http://www.documentation.com/ ), then come back to the list
with specific questions. Be aware that any information more than a
few months old may well be out-of-date.
If you have paper docs which you want to let users search and
print online while preserving the existing formatting and
layout, PDF is a good solution.
If you want to provide context-sensitive specially-written-
for-online-help docs, HTML is a good solution.
To put it another way, PDF is generally better for online *manuals*,
and HTML is generally better for online *help*.
In theory both formats can be viewed on virtually any platform, but
in practice it's more complicated than that.
Stuart Burnfield ("Down, Arlen! Heel, David! STAY!")
Functional Software Pty Ltd mailto:slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au