Re: Using ragged right in technical publications

Subject: Re: Using ragged right in technical publications
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 09:01:11 -0500

It seems to me that layout has meaning.

Rather than worry about inconclusive studies that show small differences
in readability, think about what the different layouts say. Look at some
texts, and consider the tone and the subtleties of point of view.

Realize that the meaning varies with media and culture. For example,
full justification in email screams either "commercial" or "raving" (and
looks real funny in proportional fonts) while it's implications in other
media are much more subtle and not necessarily bad.

Mike Huber
>mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: a simple question
Next by Author: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Previous by Thread: Re: Using ragged right in technical publications
Next by Thread: Re: Using ragged right in technical publications


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads