Re: Masters without slaves

Subject: Re: Masters without slaves
From: Wayne Douglass <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 09:55:28 -0700

At 10:16 AM 9/19/97 -0500, Chris Hamilton wrote:
>I don't want to draw this out or give it new life, but here's the deal:
>
>The product I'm currently documenting has something called profiles, of
>which there are three flavors: master, server, and thread. The master
>profile is just a list of all the resources that can be included in the
>server and thread profiles. (I'd go into what all that means, but it
>can't be done quickly.)
>
>There's no mention of slaves anywhere. So, is the use of the word
>"master" without the context of slaves offensive?
>
Good question. What about "multiple master" font technology?

--Wayne
---------------------------------------------
Wayne Douglass phone: 408-542-2139
Verity, Inc. FAX: 408-542-2040
894 Ross Road mailto:wayned -at- verity -dot- com
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 http://www.verity.com
"Connecting People With Information"
---------------------------------------------

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Help! Need technical authors for research study. (fwd)
Next by Author: Re: Its and It's/ Affect and Effect
Previous by Thread: Re: Masters without slaves
Next by Thread: Master/Slave, etc.


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads