Re: Master/Slave

Subject: Re: Master/Slave
From: Nora Merhar <nmerhar -at- CHARLESINDUSTRIES -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 14:13:04 -0500

I suggested master/servant in an earlier post. Would that imply the same relationship as master/slave?

Nora
nmerhar -at- charlesindustries -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Independent contractor status (was Downside of contracting)
Previous by Thread: Re: Master/Slave
Next by Thread: Re: Master/Slave


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads