Re: Fun Pairs -- mute point vs. moot point

Subject: Re: Fun Pairs -- mute point vs. moot point
From: Beth Agnew <bagnew -at- INSYSTEMS -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 09:59:41 -0400

This person with the English degree from Oxford who feels "mute point" is
an acceptable variation on "moot point" is mistaken. She ought to know
better. Giving it a definition is rationalizing its misuse. Now, if she
wants to coin a _new_ term, "mute point", that's entirely different. (You
should know _why_it's different.) This sounds like one of those urban
legends -- apocryphal stories that become ingrained in the culture. Are we
now going to have urban etymology?

--Beth

Beth Agnew
Senior Technical Writer, InSystems Technologies Inc.
65 Allstate Parkway, Suite 100
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9X1
mailto:bagnew -at- insystems -dot- com Tel: (905) 513-1400 ext. 280
Fax: (905) 513-1419
Visit us at: http://www.insystems.com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Metaphors, then Use Cases
Previous by Thread: Re: Fun Pairs -- mute point vs. moot point
Next by Thread: Re: Fun Pairs -- mute point vs. moot point


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads