Frame to Word

Subject: Frame to Word
From: Rebecca Carr <rebecca -at- WHITE -dot- SC -dot- TI -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 11:40:58 -0500

I agree with the others...converting a large group of documents from Frame
to Word just doesn't make sense. It's regressing instead of progressing.
Don't hit them over the head with what a bad idea it is...but present
all the factual evidence and hope they will listen. I can't think of
any feature that Word does better than Frame and this decision will
probably end up costing them more in the future when they realize their
mistake.

Good luck.

Becky

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: QUESTION: Bad Experiences with FrameMaker 5.5 and Office 97?
Next by Author: work assignments
Previous by Thread: UK-based localisation company sought
Next by Thread: Re: Frame to Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads