TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Is "proactive" really a word? From:Simon North <north -at- SYNOPSYS -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:54:00 +0001
> Dear Grammarians,
> Is "proactive" a word?
Yes it is, and it drives me up the wall to hear my Silicon Valley
colleagues (mis)use it. I hear it often from marketing types who
appear to think that it "being proactive" is vaguely synonymous with
taking the initiative (as in pro ... + active).
In fact it is a term stolen from psychology meaning exactly the
reverse. To paraphrase from the dictionary I found it in:
proactive: of a mental effect from a previous situation which is
active in a subsequent activity, especially in learning theory, as
'proactive inhibition', interference, the inhibition or interference
with learning caused by effects that remain active from conditions
preceeding that learning.
Also known as "negative transfer" as in the example in which the
ability to remember is adversely affected by events prior to the
Simon North north -at- synopsys -dot- com
COSSAP Technical Writer, Aachen, Germany