Thanks for 3-D advice

Subject: Thanks for 3-D advice
From: Emily Cotlier <Cotlier -at- JBLSMTP -dot- PHL -dot- LRPUB -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 09:25:40 -0500

Sorry to take so long getting around to this....Thank you to everyone who
offered advice on the "3D" versus "3-D" question. Six out of seven
responses were in favor of "three-dimensional" as the full version, and
"3-D" as the abbreviation, based on the Associated Press and Microsoft
Technical Usage style guides. Special thanks to Bill Bledsoe at CMS!

Best wishes,

Emily Cotlier

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: 3D or 3-D?
Next by Author: Programs new tech writers should know
Previous by Thread: Spelling in Canada (Was: Re: Modeling or modelling? (OO))
Next by Thread: educational change on cybertable


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads