USAGE: "Therefore" and "thus"

Subject: USAGE: "Therefore" and "thus"
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- AXIONET -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 20:24:16 -0500

Emru Townsend <emru -at- CORECO -dot- COM> wrote:

>Anyway, my question: in many of the documents, I see gleeful >overuse of "therefore" and "thus." Nine times out of ten, I >find this grating on my ear when I mentally "listen" to the >document. I'm currently looking for ways around these terms, >but most of the time, I'm stumped. The words accurately convey >the intended meaning, but they just seem wrong.

You might use a thesaurus.

However, if the words grate, they may be unnecessary, either because
they're used inappropriately or because the logical connections are
strong enough without them. Try just leaving them out.
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
(bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com) (604) 421-7189 or 688-6211 L. 290 (Updated 18 October, 1997)
Job Bank Team, STC Canada West Coast Chapter

"Did you see him on the corner
& his lip would reach the pavement,
He's been hiding from his razor,
Is he not an awful sight?
In love he was the purest,
Now he's frightening our tourists
If he went and asked his father,
I'm sure he'd put him right."
- Andy M. Stewart, Take Her In Your Arms"

Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives:,, or
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.

Previous by Author: good print/online font
Next by Author: Re: expectations of an entry-level writer
Previous by Thread: Re: USAGE: "Therefore" and "thus"
Next by Thread: What exactly is minimalist documentation?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads