Re: Technical Writing Defined At Last

Subject: Re: Technical Writing Defined At Last
From: Kathryn J Acciari <acciari -at- ACSU -dot- BUFFALO -dot- EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 10:31:19 -0500

Hi Mary!

I like your definition and would only change part 2 to read:
The product is documentation that very few would read *for pleasure*. :->

Kathryn J Acciari
(Wordsmiths and STC)
Technical Writer/Communicator
Buffalo, New York
acciari -at- acsu -dot- buffalo -dot- edu

On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, DURL wrote:

>< snip> (2) The product is documentation that no one (or very few)
> would read by choice.
> ??? Thanks for (civil) comments,
> Mary
>
> Mary Durlak Erie Documentation Inc.
> East Aurora, New York (near Buffalo)
> durl -at- buffnet -dot- net
>
>
>

http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/



Previous by Author: Frame training
Next by Author: Editing Estimate
Previous by Thread: Re: Technical Writing Defined At Last
Next by Thread: Re: Technical Writing Defined At Last


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads