TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Digital Printing? From:Tom Johnson <johnsont -at- FREEWAY -dot- NET> Date:Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:47:20 -0500
Jennifer Jelinek wrote:
> I'm in the process of reexamining some of our printing options for
> four-color documents, and I just got a letter from a vendor asking to
> discuss digital printing options, touting it as the wave of the future and
> the better alternative to offset printing. My understanding is that this
> process bypasses films and plates, and prints directly from file to
> finished product.
> The one "con" I've encountered is that because the product doesn't go to
> films first, you don't have same capacity for proofs and color correction
> that you do with offset printing. Is this the case?
> Jennifer Jelinek
> Marketing Services Manager
> Plymouth Products, Inc. Sheboygan, WI
> jlkraus -at- ametekwater -dot- com
I don't know about the color correction issue, but why would you need a
proof? I would think with digital printing you could get the printer to
run off a couple sample copies for a minimal fee in lieu of a proof. It
wouldn't be a proof, it would be the real thing. Am I missing something?
Elk Rapids Engineering - A Division of Star Cutter Company
business mailto:johnsont -at- starcutter -dot- com
personal mailto:tjohnson -at- grandtraverse -dot- com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My opinions are still my own.