Re: Anonymous Posts

Subject: Re: Anonymous Posts
From: "P.A. Gantt" <pagantt -at- POSTOFFICE -dot- WORLDNET -dot- ATT -dot- NET>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:02:06 -0500

> <SNIP>
> <<o What say some of you about "anonymous"
> posts?>>
>
> If we're discussing ideas, what's the difference if a name is attached?

Because "anonymous" was asking about Denise's credentials'(sig.) yet did not
give his/her sig. Rather unfair to Denise
and others willing *not* to be "anonymous" and stand by
their statements with their name.

> IMHO, Anonymous has said some really great things over the years.

Which "anonymous"??? Is there just one or more than one???

<tee hee>

--
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,

P.A. Gantt
<mailto:pagantt -at- bigfoot -dot- com>
Electronic Media Design and Support
M.S., HRD, The University of Tennessee

¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,

"Sometimes, the most difficult things to learn
are the least complicated." -- Anonymous

http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/



Previous by Author: Re: (Fwd) Re: Not Wanted--Technical Writers
Next by Author: Re: (Fwd) Re: Not Wanted--Technical Writers
Previous by Thread: Anonymous Posts
Next by Thread: Re: Anonymous Posts


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads