TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Not Wanted--Technical Writers From:Chuck Melikian <chuckm -at- MDHOST -dot- CSE -dot- TEK -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:52:26 -0800
From the article:
# EXAMPLE ONE
# How to log on at a product call center.
# BEFORE: Before a call arrives, a call center agent must be logged on and
# available to receive that call. In addition, a supervisor responsible
# for that agent's performance is typically logged on. When the supervisor
# and the agent sign on, their devices (telephones or PCs) establish a X.25
# virtual circuit to the Call Distribution System. This connection will be
# in place for the duration of the time the agent/supervisor is logged on.
# When the agent logs on, a data connection to the corporate host database
# may also be established.
# AFTER: A call center's supervisor and agent log on to the Call Distribution
# System, establishing a connection that can last throughout the workday.
Well, it seems to me that both the original writer and the gen-x
poet both totally missed the point here. I don't see anything in
either BEFORE or AFTER that explains "HOW TO LOG ON at a product
call center". From my reading, both writers failed. I would send
it back to be rewritten. The problem is that the writer should
have written a procedure and neither of the writers did that.
Of course, it is possible that the journalist did a bad job of picking
an example. Or that the journalist's editor hacked up the copy. But, if
the above "example" is what really appeared in a manual, it is no
wonder technical writers have a bad reputation.