TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Fair Use Law From:Michael Lewis <lewism -at- BRANDLE -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Fri, 19 Dec 1997 10:28:42 +1100
Recent divergent threads on copyright law reveal, above all, that it's a
complex and rapidly changing issue. More: the original issue of "what is
protected" got split into "protected where", "protected from what", "how
protection is provided", and a few others.
The common point to all of these is that I've also known lawyers to be
wrong -- esp general counsel: here in Australia, there's a growing
number of specialist lawyers in the field of intellectual property. I
imagine things aren't too different elsewhere.
One thing we all need to remember is that -- Berne convention
notwithstanding -- copyright law varies from country to country. (One
reason why trying to legislate for the protection of internet-accessed
material is the kind of pointless exercise only a politician would take
on.) For example, in Australia there's no facility for registration:
once you've *written* something, it's protected. There's a case to be
made for registration as a matter of evidence, but it wouldn't achieve
anything else in this context.
Brandle Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia
PO Box 1249, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012
Suite 8, The Watertower, 1 Marian St, Redfern 2016
Tel +61-2-9310-2224 ... Fax +61-2-9310-5056