TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FW: Problem contracts From:Alan Burke <aburke -at- HRGATE -dot- GC -dot- LUCENT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 12 Jan 1998 14:13:00 EST
If you stop and think about it - it is rather scary to read these kind
of comments!! I wonder if your company, John, thought that they had to
do that to "cover" the admin. costs associated with the "time" spent in
the bidding "contest?" Or was it to just do business with a "guaranteed"
paying vendor?? :) Just kiding - No offense intended!!!!!!
From one who has worked on active duty and as a civilian in the military,
it was ALWAYS scary for us to realize that we may trust our lives with
equipment and things that were built by the lowest bidder. I'd hate to
be a pilot - knowing that I'm flying something that was built by a
company that was the lowest bidder, albeit several hundred millions or
even billions of dollars. :) Your right, a hammer does start looking
pretty good at this point!!
Alan Burke
Tech Writer Contractor
currently @ Lucent Technologies
----------
From: posada[SMTP:posada -at- FAXSAV -dot- COM]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 1998 10:42 AM
To: LISTSERV.OKSTATE.EDU!TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Problem contracts
It's funny...people who don't know cannot believe why a toilet seat or =
hammer would cost $20,000
After you've gone through the process that Eric has gone through, and =
this doesn't even include the manufacturing to Mil-Spec standards, that =
hammer starts to look more and more like a bargain.
I was with a company that did work for both Federal and private sector.
=
We charged 3X the price for the same product when done for the =
government, and after a couple of years, stopped taking the business =
even at those prices...and one agency pleaded with us to raise our price
=
even more rather than to stop talking orders.
John Posada, Technical Writer (and proud of the title)
The world's premier Internet fax service company: The FaxSav Global =
Network
-work http://www.faxsav.com -personal http://www.tdandw.com
-work mailto:posada -at- faxsav -dot- com -personal mailto:john -at- tdandw -dot- com
-work phone: 732-906-2000 X2296 -home phone: 732-291-7811
My opinions are mine, and neither you nor my company can take credit for
=
them.
HEY! Are you coming to the NJ TechWriter lunch? So far, about 10
of us are. Ask me about it.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA [SMTP:geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 1998 10:35 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Problem contracts
Eric Ray reported a problem with a good contract gone bad
as a result of the bureaucracy kicking in. Eric, I spent 6
years working with the feds, so I know whereat you speak.
