TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In early January I asked if Pagemaker would be an improvement over Word for
producing a series of graphics-intensive documents. I promised to summarize to
the list. I've waited, because I wanted to apply some of the advice I was given
before drawing any conclusions.
I have a 250+ page manual with 188 graphics. The graphics have numerous
callouts. The manual is divided into 21 files. Word crashes with appalling
regularity on these documents. Consequently, I find it more stable when I don't
use master document or RD fields. I incorporate graphics by reference and I do
all indexing manually. These steps help, but don't eliminate the problems.
I converted the files to Framemaker, which I own at home. Things worked well.
I lobbied to get Framemaker at work, but failed. However, I was given a copy of
Pagemaker, still in the box, that they already had with the mandate to try and
use it, if feasible.
I'm facing some very tough deadlines, so I turned to the list for help
figuring out 1) if Pagemaker would meet my needs; 2) how to get up to speed
quickly on it.
Split. That's why I decided that I needed to attack the problem and judge for
myself. Here are a few key issues that came up:
Graphics: Most respondents praised the graphics handling capabilities of
Pagemaker, but felt it somewhat cumbersome for book-length projects. I'm finding
they're right. Things I find simple in Word, such as headers and footers, are
clunky in Pagemaker. On the other hand, once I figured them out, I could move on
to other things.
Learning curve: I thought I could pick up any new word processing/desktop
publishing software in half an hour and become moderately proficient within a
week. I have to admit that Pagemaker has humbled me. I did pick it up quickly,
but I'm not proficient yet. It is a different paradigm and I find myself
impatient to get the simple things done. (NOTE: This response is as much a
function of deadline pressures as it is a function of the product. I know that,
but it still interferes.)
Word to Pagemaker conversion: Actually, this part was fairly simple. It's
setting up new sections and editing after conversion that take time.
Pagemaker problems on a network: One respondent had problems, several others
expressed surprise. Not an issue for me, since it will only be on my machine.
Preparation of files in PDF or postscript format: Both Framemaker and
Pagemaker do this well as respondents indicated. This has been a real pain with
the Word files, so this is one area where I can say that Pagemaker will help me
meet my deadlines. On the tests I did (same chapter prepared in all 3 programs),
Pagemaker and Framemaker both produced smaller PDF files. I don't really
understand why, since the content/resolution didn't change. Two respondents
noted similar results.
I don't think Pagemaker will make it easier to meet my March deadline.
However, it is allowing me to move towards it at a steady rate without the
crises (crashes, format errors) that I encountered in Word. Bugs have simply
made Word too risky to meet my needs. The time I'm spending on learning
Pagemaker and dealing with the few cumbersome items is a tradeoff. I am making
gains on indexing and preparing output for the printer. Next release, I expect
Pagemaker will increase my productivity. Comparing all three products (Word,
Framemaker, and Pagemaker) I would still choose Framemaker for the type of
document I'm working on, but that's not a choice I have.
This is a short summary and I'm still trying to familiarize myself with many
of the tips people provided. When I do, I may learn to love Pagemaker. I've
gathered a lot of useful information that I think would be helpful to others
evaluating these products. I hope to write an article and put it on a web page,
but it'll have to wait until after my March deadlines. :)