TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Pagemaker vs. FrameMaker From:Karen Molloy <kmolloy -at- ON -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 6 Feb 1998 12:25:59 -0500
Paul Carr <sorcha -at- BBS -dot- MACNEXUS -dot- ORG> asked:
> A friend just started a new job where they evidently have PageMaker, and
> the artist she would be working with is used to working with PM. She is
> being asked to assemble a manual.
> She asks me: Should she recommend they get Frame, or just stick with
> what the company already has?
and Amy Brown <abrown -at- openmarket -dot- com> replied:
>Depends on the length and complexity of the manual she'll produce. Frame
is much better >than PageMaker at indexing, cross-referencing, and all
those other niggling book-production >tasks. PageMaker is sort of a
stripped-down version of Frame for producing posters, >brochures, etc. In
general, if you want to write a book, use Frame; if you want to produce >a
graphics-heavy document such as a poster, use Page.
I've used both products (and I am a regular FrameMaker user). I would agree
with AB's first comment -- depends on the length and complexity of the
manual. I had to produce two manuals in PageMaker a couple of years ago,
and was surprised to find that it was more that just a "poster 'n brochure"
package. I was skeptical at first, being such a FrameMaker fan, but
PageMaker actually does have some bookmaking features. Such features
include a surprisingly robust indexing utility for such a product. (The
company I worked for was a small startup and did not want purchase
FrameMaker at that point; they used PageMaker for all printed materials.)
If you are producing simple manuals under 100 pages I'd say you could do so
in PageMaker. (I believe a similar sentiment is expressed in another
current thead about PageMaker.)