Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font--CORRECTION

Subject: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font--CORRECTION
From: "Linda K. Sherman" <linsherm -at- CONCENTRIC -dot- NET>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 22:32:47 -0500

I carelessly wrote:

> But he can try Kino MT (don't ask me where I got
> it, but it's on my system).

I meant "Letter Gothic", not "Kino MT", which is about as
proportional as you can get. Sorry for the mix-up. (Thanks to Michael
Lewis for bringing the error to my attention.)

L.
--
Linda K. Sherman <linsherm -at- concentric -dot- net>
Lintech Systems, Inc.
Programming and technical communications consultants
Specializing in computer telephony systems
4745 Grand Blvd. - New Port Richey, FL 34652 USA
*** DYSGWCH YR IAITH GYMRAEG *** LEARN THE WELSH LANGUAGE ***
http://www.concentric.net/~linsherm/corner.html

--
Linda K. Sherman <linsherm -at- concentric -dot- net>
Lintech Systems, Inc.
Programming and technical communications consultants
Specializing in computer telephony systems
4745 Grand Blvd. - New Port Richey, FL 34652 USA
*** DYSGWCH YR IAITH GYMRAEG *** LEARN THE WELSH LANGUAGE ***
http://www.concentric.net/~linsherm/corner.html




Previous by Author: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font--CORRECTION
Next by Author: Re: Grammar Guides, Dictionaries, etc.
Previous by Thread: Re: Non-ugly, non-proportional font--CORRECTION
Next by Thread: Re: Professional-Related Questions (was "How to provide writing s amples")


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads