TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Question about Programmers and Usability -Reply
Subject:Re: Question about Programmers and Usability -Reply From:Penny Staples <pstaples -at- AIRWIRE -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 26 Feb 1998 08:26:00 -0600
Carol Van Natta wrote:
> My experience is that programmers DO care about usability,
> it's just a failure of imagination on the programmer's part that
> users aren't as fond of or as comfortable with computers.
> (That, and the fact that making something more user friendly
> usually takes more programming time and effort).
I don't think lack of imagination is the problem, at least, not
in my experience. With few exceptions, the programmers and
engineers I've worked with have been highly imaginative and
creative people. (Lots of 'em seem to be musicians in their spare
time; anyone else notice this?)
My Pet Theory:
I think the whole developer/useability problem has more
to do with familiarity and point of view. Programmers are
intimately familiar with how computers, programming languages
and programs work. They look at problems based on what
will work most efficiently given a particular programming
language and platform. And I think this is necessary.
Unfortunately it means many have a hard time considering
their work from the point of view of a user who knows none
This is why companies need Technical Writers. We have
a different perspective from the programmers that allows us
to look at things from a user's point of view.