Re: Reality? Was: HTML vs PDF

Subject: Re: Reality? Was: HTML vs PDF
From: Katav <katav -at- YAHOO -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:15:12 -0800

for 2 cents - plain

Which is why tutorials should be available BOTH
on-line AND downloadable, /preferably/ is a
compressed (self-extracting?) format -- I don't
want to wait (pay) while a uncompressed 4M course
downloads across my 28.8 modem when that same course
could be compressed to half its size (or better).

katav ( katav -at- yahoo -dot- com )

---Linda Castellani <linda -at- GRIC -dot- COM> wrote:

Maybe it's just me, but when I find a tutorial, I download it, ...
Then ... connect charges become a
non-issue.

At 12:16 PM 3/13/98 +0000, Sarah Carroll wrote:

... until methods for accessing the net change from using telephone
lines to a less expensive method ... to complete a tutorial ... most
... want the paper copy.

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Previous by Author: Fwd: Re: Mil Spec Information
Next by Author: SUMMARY: Office 95/97 coexist
Previous by Thread: Re: Reality? Was: HTML vs PDF
Next by Thread: Re: Reality? Was: HTML vs PDF


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads