Re: Binding arb clause in new contract--unfair?!

Subject: Re: Binding arb clause in new contract--unfair?!
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 15:29:18 -0600

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keith Arnett [SMTP:keith_arnett -at- RESTON -dot- OMD -dot- STERLING -dot- COM]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 9:26 AM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Binding arb clause in new contract--unfair?!
>...
> I'd consider this a big red flag, and proceed with caution before I
> entered into any long term relationship with this organization.
>...
>--------------
>
>Something to remember is that, at the core, a contract is a form of
>communication. Think about what it says about them and what kind of working
>relationship they propose.
>
>What's enforceable (and I have a suspicion that, in most states, signing all
>rights away isn't) only matters when you get to court, or, in this case the
>arbitrator's office. The attitude it presents affects you every day. The
>ethical damage of signing something you don't mean on the grounds that you
>can't be held to it affects you immediately.
>
>I'd look into the arbitration organization - maybe they are very reputable
>and fair and it's a reasonable clause. Maybe not.
>
---
mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com
Home: nax -at- execpc -dot- com
>




Previous by Author: Re: Writing Samples
Next by Author: Re: Trapping your content in HTML
Previous by Thread: Re: Binding arb clause in new contract--unfair?!
Next by Thread: Re: Binding arb clause in new contract--unfair?!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads