TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>As a fairly long-time active member of STC, I have had >occasion to meet and talk with many people who call themselves .technical writers. Believe me, I would not agree with their >assessment of the terms.
I'm sure you didn't meant to suggest that membership in the STC
demonstrates writing ability, but that is what your sentence seems to
In fact, the only requirement for STC membership is the money to join.
Whether or not anyone is an accomplished writer has nothing to do with
membership in the STC. I've tidied up after more than one STC member,
and I know several writers whom I consider my betters who refuse to
belong to the STC because they dislike the way it operates.
Like academic standing, STC membership is a paper qualification that has
nothing to do with actual ability.
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
(604) 421-7189 or 687-2133
bbyfield -at- axionet or bruce -at- dataphile-ca -dot- com
"Nor did I know I was being auditioned
For the male lead in your drama,
Miming through the first easy movements
As if with eyes closed, feeling for the role."
-Ted Hughes, "Visit"