Re: Not being included

Subject: Re: Not being included
From: "Michael Hood; SET TECHWR-L NOMAIL" <hoodmp -at- RAPISTAN -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:54:44 -0400


That's been one of my pet peeves for years. But a human resources person?
That's going way too far. Next thing they'll want to add is the shipping
department personal, or the component parts buyer.

You're so right, though. Since we're the responsible party that makes it
all come together, and the first to take a hit when the fan gets in the
way, it seems only logical to include the writer and even perhaps the


Previous by Author: New term for Techwriters?
Next by Author: Re: Learning Curve
Previous by Thread: Re: Not Being Included
Next by Thread: Re: Not Being Included

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads