TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Salaries: Kill this stupid topic From:Sharon Key <sharon -at- DRA -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:37:56 -0500
Sorry Joel. I beg to differ. What is stupid to one person, is relevant to
another.
That's why the Delete button exists.
Sharon Key
Documentation Specialist
Data Research Associates
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Turnipseed [SMTP:JTurnipseed -at- DATAWORKSMPLS -dot- COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 1:02 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Salaries: Kill this stupid topic
Can we kill this stupid topic? Obviously a 25-35/hr contract rate
does
not mean 100K/year. If we look at our respective states' labor
figures,
we'd find something like 17/hr median and 19/hr mean incomes. Add
benefits and vacation and training and offices, etc. (in addition to
52
week, count 'em all including vacation, working years) and it all
comes
out in the wash. As for extravagent salaries, I know personally of
only
one tech writing position (contract) that paid outrageous wages: 55
&
85/hr respectively for two contract tech writers.
It required extensive Unix/Oracle/Parallel Programming experience
and
was based in San Jose. I don't know any PROGRAMMERS who could have
done
this job.
Let's face it: tech writers who are not managers make a middle class
income.
Can we talk about something more useful now? How 'bout any good
books on
pedagogy? Wading through the morass of really, really stupid
technical
writing books?
-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Steve [mailto:steve -dot- taylor -at- ALLEGIANCETELECOM -dot- COM]
Sent: June 10, 1998 12:48 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Salary Survey from STC
>In my ten years as a tech writer, I've never met anyone who earns
as
much
as the STC survey medians indicate (for the respective
qualifications).
Then again, I'm in the Midwest.>
I agree with Mark. I looked at that survey, and found, in my
experience
over
the last two years, the salaries quoted there aren't median, but
high-end.
I don't know of any of my contemporaries who are earning that kind
of
money.
I know of database programmers who might, but not technical
writers...
I found the same with the local chapter's salary survey. The figures
seemed
high.
I think if we did our own unofficial survey, we'd find things
different.
How
many technical writers out there, either independent or otherwise,
who
make
100K a year (gross)? Remember, according to the survey, that's a
median,
which means half of all salaries are higher...not in Dallas, there
aren't.
------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Taylor
Consultant for Technical Directions, Inc.
On location at:
Allegiance Telecom, Inc.
Dallas, TX
(214) 853-7182
steve -dot- taylor -at- allegiancetelecom -dot- com http://www.alegiancetele.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
~~~
Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
TECHWR-L)
Send commands to listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g., SIGNOFF
TECHWR-L)
