Re: ISO 9000

Subject: Re: ISO 9000
From: Smokey Lynne L Bare <slbare -at- JUNO -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:48:35 -0400

Dear Hani,

First, ISO processes are referred to as either paying to be externally
audited and becoming Registered, or internally audited to become
compliant, unless in the British Isles, where it is 'certificated'.

Second, your question is way too broad in spectrum. It is like asking
what breed of horse do you like, or what athletic pro sport is the best
for pro-rule sanctions. You need to be specific. Compliancy works well
for some instances, and other, more serious-outcome instances should have
their processes Registered.

Service organizations (computer and project management firms) are seeing
the importance of becoming Registered, as it is usually their only taste
of an internal QA process. It also is a wonderful 'business-getting'
marketing tool. You should check the archives, as Mr. Robinson set up a
wonderful explanation, and provided a definitive structure on how to
judge if you are a candidate for ISO methodology or not.

SLBare, C.T.C.




Previous by Author: Re: Tech. Writer Position, Aachen, Germany
Next by Author: Re: RE ISO-9000
Previous by Thread: ISO 9000
Next by Thread: Re: ISO 9000


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads