TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: FWD: Hourly Rate in Bay Area From:Barb Philbrick <caslonsvcs -at- IBM -dot- NET> Date:Tue, 7 Jul 1998 15:40:24 GMT
> (1) Most tech communicators in the survey are writers, not editors.
>Does the average writer charge more or less than the average editor?
I know people who charge lower rates for editing than for writing.
However, I don't agree with this practice --- a good editor brings as
much or more experience and knowledge to the table as a good writer.
(Note that I don't get much editing work with this attitude; clients
instead go to the ones who charge less. Fortunately, I can afford to
stick to my guns on this issue. My tune (and rate) would probably
change if I was dependent on editing work.)
> (3) Do the tech communicators who charge the $65/$58 rates have
>extraordinary technical knowledge in many "hot" areas?
I think these rates reflect cost of living, not extraordinary
technical knowledge. I'm not sure where you moved from, but if I was
to move from Cleveland, OH, to San Francisco, I'd bump up my rates to
those shown here strictly to cover cost of living. I'm a good writer,
have stronge working knowledge in my primary field (hardware
documentation), and have a some knowledge of the "hot" areas, but I
wouldn't call my skills extraordinary.
> (4) I'm *not* an experienced user of FrameMaker, which seems to be
>very popular here.
It would probably be a good idea to learn Frame, but you can probably
find work for companies that use other programs. The need for a
particular application also depends on how you edit --- are you
working with source files or hard copy?
> (5) Is it only the larger and/or very profitable tech companies who
>can pay the $65/$58 rates? Would it be true that we can't charge
>startups, smallish, and/or less profitable companies the same rates?
I charge everyone the same rate. They can either pay it or they can't.
A startup isn't going to charge less for their services or products
than their costs if they expect to stay in business. We shouldn't be
any different. I set a salary for myself (plus I have other office
expenses, cushion for downtime, and so on). I can't afford to flex my
rates for every other customer.
In addition, it's a small technical writing world, and your big
clients could find out what your little clients are paying. I never
want to have to answer the question, "I heard you're charging XYZ
$15/hour less than you're charging us." They would (justifiably, I
think) feel like they were being ripped off. Your big clients aren't
in business to subsidize your small clients.
In short, I've decided that my skill set is worth $XX/hour where I
live. I'm don't charge differently for the type of work I'm doing or
the type of company I'm working for.
>Bottom line: should I be charging anywhere close to the $65/$58 survey
I assume you were contracting before, so what I would do is find out
the difference in cost of living between the area you were in and SF,
and adjust your rates accordingly. I've heard that the SF/Silicon
Valley area is a really hot market for technical writers these days,
so you might be able to get something of a premium as well.
There are also local fluctuations. For example, here in Cleveland, I
can get about $10/hour more than I can in Akron, which is only about
30 miles south. I haven't figured out why yet (maybe it's just the
companies I've contacted), but you might find a similar situation. Go
to STC meetings and talk to other contractors in your area.
As a side note, I found rates listed in the CIC-SIG survey to be a
little low for my area. I suspect the SIG is working with a fairly
small survey size within each chapter (I know most of the other
contractors in my area don't belong to the SIG), so take the numbers
with a grain of salt. Instead, figure out what you need to make to
stay in business.
>I don't want to quote either too low or too high, and I
>especially don't want to scare away potential clients.
It is scary until you get to know an area (and have some existing
clients so you can afford to lose a job or two). However, decide on a
rate, present it firmly and don't waffle.
Guess I used up my allotment of TECHWR-L space for the day! I hope
this is helpful,
Barbara Philbrick, Caslon Services Inc.
Technical Writing. caslonsvcs -at- ibm -dot- net