TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: The Job Market: What's the Real Story? From:Matt Danda <mdanda2 -at- YAHOO -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 10 Jul 1998 06:58:24 -0700
Maurice King wrote:
>How many times have you seen a variation on the text of this letter in
response to submitting a resume for a job?
I think if you refer to some of the industry-standard books on "How to
Land the Dream Job" you'll see that this phenomenon is pretty standard.
>if being a consultant means being exploited any worse than the case
of a salaried employee, I have reason to worry.
I question your definition of "exploitation." This is not factory work
in the third world--this is a white-collar profession. As such, you
NEED to have negotiation skills, self-management skills, and grace
under adversity. Don't talk about "exploitation" unless your story is
enough to create a legitimate legal case.
Contracting is tough! Who told you it wasn't?
>I'd like some of your experiences, just to compare notes.
Everyone has bad days. My current contract is completely different
than what the recruiter sold me on. Sure, its a bummer, but I am able
to adapt and keep employed.
In fact, I used that recruiter error as a key point in my
renegotiations for a better rate. And I got a raise out of it! So much
for being "exploited."