TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Charge for Travel Time? From:Barb Philbrick <caslonsvcs -at- IBM -dot- NET> Date:Thu, 23 Jul 1998 13:24:01 GMT
>If a contractor works mostly off-site
>should he/she charge for travel time
>to/from the site?
I don't charge travel time unless it's more than 30 miles away. If I
do charge for travel time, I let my client know it. This holds for
on-site and off-site work. My rationale is that:
* You have to travel to get to any job, so it's not fair to charge for
* Most of the time I work off-site, so my travel is minimal.
* I deduct about half of my car expenses.
Ultimately, I think it's a personal decision based on your business
philosophy and how you've calculated your billable rate.
>The company's new policy is to have it's
>writers use a tool that is new in the market.
>QUES: Who pays for the learning time?
If it's a commonly used program, I'll pick up the learning costs,
since I'll probably be able to use the program for other clients. It
also increases my worth as a contractor. If it's a rarely used that I
am highly unlikely to use, I'd ask the client to pay for training.
Last year one of my clients had an in-house training course that I
attended. They paid for the course (no extra cost for me --- they paid
a flat rate for up to xx people), but I took a week off billables to
Barbara Philbrick, Caslon Services Inc.
Technical Writing. caslonsvcs -at- ibm -dot- net