Re: voice recognition software

Subject: Re: voice recognition software
From: Dave Whelan <dwhelan -at- PANGEA -dot- CA>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 15:46:40 -0500

Matt says:

>Both use speech recognition, as opposed to voice
>recognition. Simple system navigation works very well with little or no
training.
>With an hour or so put into training, dictation of discreet speech runs
upward of
>90-95wpm.

Does this mean that if one person trains it for an hour or so, it can
produce corrected type at 90-95wpm from anyone's speech? If so, it is far
better than anything I have ever heard of, how much is it?

Regards,
Dave.

****************************************************
David P. Whelan, Whelan Technical Services
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (204) 334-1339
mailto:d -dot- whelan -at- ieee -dot- org
http://www.pangea.ca/~dwhelan
****************************************************


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: voice recognition software
Next by Author: Letter of Intent
Previous by Thread: Re: voice recognition software
Next by Thread: Re: voice recognition software


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads