TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: U.S. vs. British Quotes From:"David M. Brown" <dmbrown -at- BROWN-INC -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 11 Sep 1998 10:33:48 -0700
Thomas Quine wrote:
> The disadvantage to British punctuation is mainly typographical.
> Punctuation looks a little awkward hanging outside the quotes.
I think the quotation mark looks a bit awkward hanging outside the
period or comma, too.
In what little print work I do nowadays, I "stack" the period or comma
and the quotation mark, so that each is placed exactly as it would be if
the other were absent. It takes a little extra effort, but it looks
much better to me than either of these alternatives:
Type "test." /* If the period were *supposed* to be typed,
Type "test". /* I'd set it as in the first example.
I've never heard a single complaint from a client or reader about the
stacked punctuation. It makes me wonder why none of the "expert" font
sets seem to include such a ligature.
David M. Brown -- Brown Inc.
dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com http://www.brown-inc.com/
See our web site for news about HTML Indexer, the easiest way to
create and maintain indexes for web sites and other HTML documents.