TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Ranges: Two or Three From:Sella Rush <sellar -at- APPTECHSYS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:12:57 -0700
What an interesting question. Here's my purely personal approach:
When I think of "ranges", I think of ranging on a plane. And a plane is
made up of infinite points. I don't think of a range as one-dimensional (a
line). Information can be two-dimensional, and there are times when we need
to define the range of 2D information. For example, you might say a vet
treats all animals, ranging from dogs to raccoons to cattle. There's no way
to force all animals in a straight line with a beginning and end.
Stylistically, I think 3 is a good limit. But something like "dogs and cats
to horses and cattle" let you get away with 4. But using "and" implies a
nearer relationship than "to". In effect, you're returning to a 1D line.
Sella Rush mailto:sellar -at- apptechsys -dot- com
Applied Technical Systems (ATS)
Developers of the CCM Database