Constraints on e-mail expression

Subject: Constraints on e-mail expression
From: Roger Jones <Roger -dot- Jones -at- RJPC -dot- DEMON -dot- CO -dot- UK>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 11:41:39 +0100

At 19:25 25/09/98 -0700, Mary Lynn wrote:

>As for your second point--the difficulty of emphasizing what you say in
>emails--I agree that it can be very frustrating. I personally use an
>email program that does not show bold or italics. And like you, I don't
>want to be interpreted as a SHOUTER. :-) I've seen a couple of ways
>around this problem, and I actually think they are rather creative.
>One thing I've seen people do is _underline_ what they want to
>emphasize. What I tend to do is use *asterisks* to stress something
>that I want stressed. The trick is to not overuse either method. Both
>can be rather annoying if used extensively.

I think the limitations of e-mail format are a wonderful challenge to write
in a way that conveys emphasis and other qualities through good old words
and their arrangement, rather than resorting to post-typewriter
typographical devices, which I use fully in other contexts. What a good
thing it is to be forced to think harder about communication!

All the best

Roger Jones, Publisher
Publishing -at- rjpc -dot- demon -dot- co -dot- uk

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Gender
Next by Author: TOOLS: Special characters in Windows
Previous by Thread: FW: Gender
Next by Thread: Re: Run Book or Runbook?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads