TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: kHz or KHz? From:"Maguire, Sean P" <Sean -dot- Maguire -at- PSS -dot- BOEING -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 29 Sep 1998 10:41:05 -0700
Finally, after having lurked for a while, a question I can answer! The
correct use is kHz. When abbreviated, kilo- should always be lowercase.
It's the same with kV (kilovolt), kVA (kilovoltampere), and kW
The Boeing Company
The smallest unit of time is the yoctosecond.
- Random Fact O' The Day
> From: Dave Neufeld[SMTP:Dave_Neufeld -at- SPECTRUMSIGNAL -dot- COM]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 1998 1:52 PM
> Subject: Q: kHz or KHz?
> Hi all,
> This is for an in-house marketing style guide.
> Which is "more" correct: kHz or KHz? My preference is kHz. The MS
> Guide (copyright 1995, not the latest 3rd edition) contradicts itself.
> Read Me First! says kHz in its list of abbreviations (why is that such
> long word? <g>).
> Let the opinions roll!
> FYI; Did a search on buses vs. busses last week. Several online
> gave the impression that both were quite correct. Then I did a Deja
> search on both occurrences. The result? Busses had about 4500 hits,
> buses had 140,000 hits. Buses won.
> David Neufeld
> Technical Publications
> Spectrum Signal Processing, Inc.
> dave_neufeld -at- spectrumsignal -dot- com
> "no matter where you go..... there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai