Re: "based" hyphenations

Subject: Re: "based" hyphenations
From: Nick Marino <rhetonic -at- GTE -dot- NET>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:11:04 -0600

Not quite completely right either Ben:

It seems that what is being confused here is the rule wording itself.  It is not really a matter of before or after the noun.  What we are concerned about are compound words.  Then what we have is the question of whether or not the compound is functioning as an adjective or a noun.  The adjective function, with very few exceptions, is made with a hyphen.  The noun function is not, unless a dictionary has established that it is through usage.

Ben Kovitz wrote:

David Dvorkin replied:

>> The normal rule in English is that a compound adjective--that is, an
>> adjective formed of two or more words--is hyphenated.  So yes,
>> browser-based and web-based.
>
>Not quite.  Compound adjectives are hyphenated when they precede
>the noun they modify but not if they follow it.

I've heard this in a bunch of places, but it just doesn't seem to be a true
rule of English.  Consider this sentence:

   Is this thing browser based or isn't it?

It's just plain weird without the hyphen.  It's not obvious how to parse it
until you've read the whole sentence and gone back, like a garden-path
sentence.  At first it looks like "thing browser" is the main noun phrase.
(Or substitute other reasonable words if this one doesn't confuse you.)
Here's the right way to punctuate it:

 

So, I think it's just a myth that it matters whether the compound adjective
precedes or follows the noun.  What matters is making the sentence easy to
parse and making the punctuation give clues to the expected pronunciation.
We normally put a lot more stress on "browser" than "based", so it needs a
hyphen.

Another thing to think about is whether leaving out the hyphen would appear
unintentional to the reader.  You never want the reader to start doubting
that everything you write is deliberate, or you lose the reader's trust.
Sentence that are tricky to parse because of missing punctuation plant just
this sort of doubt in the reader's mind.

--
Ben Kovitz <apteryx -at- chisp -dot- net>
Boulder, Colorado

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
     Please stay on topic--4000+ people will read your message.
Search archives at: http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/archives.htm
Check out topic summaries at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/topics.htm

begin:          vcard
fn:             Nick Marino
n:              Marino;Nick
org:            Freelance Word Works
adr;dom:        ;;;Bishop;Texas;;
email;internet: rhetonic -at- gte -dot- net
title:          Owner
tel;work:       512.584.2912
tel;fax:        512.584.3121
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: TRUE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard


Previous by Author: Startup Tips
Next by Author: CHANGING MESSAGE THREADS
Previous by Thread: Re: "based" hyphenations
Next by Thread: Technical vs. other writing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads