TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hogs From:Hayward Johnson <ndx -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Sun, 1 Nov 1998 14:17:41 -0800
*Sigh* Will we never learn?
>Robert Maxey wrote:
>> >>Forget it! I recently tried to use word to put together a catalog and
>> >>kept crashing. With the version I was using, Word 97, I found I could
>> >>put in around 3 large photos before it started acting up.
The major problem with Word is that it doesn't know if it's a word processor
or an operating system. (A typically Microbloat software characteristic.)
The problem with us tech writers is that we keep confusing Word with desktop
Word is not a DTP tool. If you need to accomplish moderate to complex layout
and design in a publication, you should use a DTP tool (Quark, Frame,
PageMaker, et cetera). If you need to write a novel, where layout complexity
is minimal, use Word.
>> How much memory do you have? Word, as well as Windows 95/NT are hogs.
>RAM is so cheap today that there's simply no reason for anyone to
>continue suffering memory problems. Add more inexpensive RAM and
>move on. If your company won't pay for the RAM upgrade, buy it
>yourself if doing so will save headaches. Doing so would constitute
>a small investment in safeguarding one's sanity.
For the reasons mentioned, memory is hardly an issue.
>Insofar as the photographs are concerned, try saving them as JPEG with
>a competent photo tool and reducing their quality to a lower but fully
>acceptable level. You can save much RAM doing this.
Actually, GIFs are more efficient, size-wise, and more compliant web-wise.
And: PaintShop Pro (way less pricey than a photo tool) handles photos pretty
BTW: Anyone out there proficient in Word (Basic) macros and/or VBA? I need
some help making Word 6 for Mac and PC automatically format UNIX text files.
Reply to this query off list to hjohnson -at- best -dot- com -dot-