TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: ANON: RE: Can a bad process make a poor writer?
Subject:Re: ANON: RE: Can a bad process make a poor writer? From:Emmy Aricioglu <EMMY_ARICIOGLU -at- HP-ROSEVILLE-OM3 -dot- OM -dot- HP -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 13 Nov 1998 12:09:26 -0800
Item Subject: ANON: RE: Can a bad process make a poor writer?
I have no idea what company this is. Situations sounds unfortunate,
but the logic of the ending is confusing.
If it's good that documents are being QA checked, wouldn't that be bad
news for the "bad" writers and good news for the "good" writers?
Although you haven't revealed what the criteria are for being "good"
(sounds like they're part of the silent conspiracy). Wouldn't the bad
writers be leaving (they're being busted after all) and the good ones
staying?
