TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Dumbing it down From:Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG> Date:Wed, 9 Dec 1998 08:32:51 -0600
> One doc had a readability level of 5.3 and the other had a
> level of 7.2. Not too bad, I thought.
Forgive my ignorance, but there are different kinds of readability
scales... are these levels the kind that are based on one's theoretical
"grade level?" If so, I know the average American who completes 12th
grade does *not* read on a 12th grade level. I don't remember how much
lower it is, but it's quite a bit lower.
Have you compared these levels to the levels of other documents written
for your audience?
> I think I know my
> audience pretty well and I always strive to produce something helpful
> to them.
You haven't told us how you know how well you know them. Have you done
any usability testing? It could be helpful here.
and then Elna said:
> There's a difference between "dumbing it down" and writing in simple, clear
> language. Grammar checkers tend to look at polysyllabic words as a measure of
> reading level - the more words you have with three or more syllables, the
> higher the reading level.
And that's one thing that has always bugged me about grammar checkers...
the idea that understanding "thermometer" requires a higher reading
level than understanding "quark." And God forbid you should write
something about Mississippi. ;-)