TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Style Guides, Take II From:David Wollenberger <david_wollenberger -at- WOODLAND-HILLS -dot- STERLING -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:40:39 -0800
I was raised with the Chicago Manual, but at my present job they use
Microsoft Manual of Style, and most of our software is not even for
I wonder why, if so many tech writers think Microsoft publishes bad
manuals and their manual of style sucks so much, so many departments
are using it as their standard.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Style Guides, Take II
Author: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- plamondon -dot- com> at sswhsmtp
Date: 12/13/98 7:16 AM
I don't see why anybody uses the Microsoft Style Guide anyway. I mean, sure,
if you think Microsoft's documentation is the bee's knees, then you'd want to
read the book to find out how they did it. But Microsoft's documentation has
been muddled and clueless from day 1. You'd be better off starting from
first principles than emulating them. At least your mistakes would be honest
and possibly ephemeral, instead of dull and institutional.