Re: Information Mapping

Subject: Re: Information Mapping
From: MAGGIE SECARA <SECARAM -at- MAINSAVER -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:28:05 -0800

Well, that's amusing. I just checked out this site and lo and behold,
the variation of IM I've been using for years looks a lot more like
DocuTools than it does like the IM samples on the IM web site. It works
just fine for me, and makes clients/employers glad.

The only trouble is when the think you can just "pour" the text from the
old manual into the new format without re-writing it, and base the
deadline on that notion. Sigh, Back to work!



Maggie Secara
The Tech Writer
MAINSAVER CMMS

http://ren.dm.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niki Dow [SMTP:NikiDow -at- RINGWOOD -dot- COM]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 9:07 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Information Mapping
>
> I'm not sure where the "private" thing came from, but there is an
> alternative - DocuTools. Check out http://www.ptaonline,com
>
>


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: Best conference if you get only one?
Next by Author: Re: Numbers
Previous by Thread: Re: Information Mapping
Next by Thread: Re: Information Mapping


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads