Re: ANON: Re: Plagiarism

Subject: Re: ANON: Re: Plagiarism
From: "John R. Sullivan" <John_Sullivan -at- STRATUS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:45:41 -0500

Tracy wrote:


A simple list of links is no more "copyrightable" than a simple list
of
street addresses or phone numbers. Any original content (such as
descriptions of the sites) would be protected by copyright, but not
just
a list of facts (which is all a list of URLs is).


I seem to recall reading some time ago that a company that compiled sports
statistics was arguing that their list of game scores etc. was copyrighted.
Isn't that just a list of facts? Does anyone recall any details about this
case? I'm curious as to how much luck they had enforcing their copyright.

John Sullivan
Stratus Computer


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: CBT/Tutorials
Next by Author: Re: ANON: Re: Plagiarism
Previous by Thread: ANON: Re: Plagiarism
Next by Thread: Re: ANON: Re: Plagiarism


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads