TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Two questions From:Elisabeth Zakes <ezakes -at- PLANVIEW -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:18:19 -0600
On Thursday, February 11, 1999 7:45 AM, Michelle Vina-Baltsas
[SMTP:Michelle_Vina-Baltsas -at- US -dot- CRAWCO -dot- COM] wrote:
> 2. I just got a manual back from the printer who used our Word file
> produce the document. On one page there is an orphan that I had
> removed from the original by shaving off points before and points
> paragraphs on the preceding page. I'm not all sure why the orphan
> back, but what I'm wondering from all of you is, how critical are you
> reviewing writing samples? If you saw a widow or an orphan in a
> would you not consider the candidate? I'm trying to decide whether
> document goes in my portfolio or not. Am I worrying needlessly?
> >>To avoid this issue you could send future files in .PDF (portable
> document format) format. I've had similar problems when sending docs
> professional printer and this has solved the problem. As someone else
> the list stated, the reason for this problem is due to the different
> printer drivers and repagination.
I also obtained the postscript driver for the printer that the printing
company actually uses. Once I create a .prn with that, all my page
breaks stay exactly as I had them.
Elisabeth B. Zakes
PlanView, Inc., Austin, TX
ezakes -at- planview -dot- com http://www.planview.com