TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Recruiters From:"Eric L. Dunn" <edunn -at- TRANSPORT -dot- BOMBARDIER -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:05:28 -0500
As the subject of recruiters and their practices has come up...
In the case of a recruiter approaching a writer for a job that was listed
in the Sunday paper (as described earlier), I'd think that this
demonstrates the recruiter is doing their job and doing it well. Where
would have a problem is if this creates a conflict between the writer
applying for the job directly and the writer being presented as the
recruiters' candidate. In this scenario I think that the writers' direct
application should be considered.
What annoys me about recruiters is the way I and others I have talked to
are often treated. You are invited to the recruiters office with a vague
description of the post, given only a job description, and asked if you
want you name put forward as a candidate. All questions about location,
company, and project details are never answered and are circumvented. This
I understand that they have to protect their profit by keeping the
reference as theirs and not having the candidate apply directly. But, if I
am to trust their professionalism in representing me they owe me the
professional respect that I will respect the agreement between myself and
the recruiter. Make me sign something that states any immediate dealings
between myself and the employer in question be through the recruiter. I
would have no problem with that. But too often the meetings with the
recruiter are a stupid song and dance/cloak and dagger game until the first
direct meeting with the employer.