Re: FrameMaker 5.1 versus 5.5

Subject: Re: FrameMaker 5.1 versus 5.5
From: Melonie Holliman <melonie -dot- holliman -at- TXEXMTA4 -dot- AMD -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:38:16 -0600

Howdy,

5.5 also seems to have better import/export capabilities. The interface
is the same, as far as I can tell.

Melonie Holliman
Tech Writer
CPD, AMD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meek, DavidX L [SMTP:davidx -dot- l -dot- meek -at- INTEL -dot- COM]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 10:37 AM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: FrameMaker 5.1 versus 5.5
>
> Based on my limited experience working with both FM5.1 and FM5.5, on
> Windows
> NT, the only real differences are 5.5's additional Web-related features.
> In
> the long run, 5.5 might be the better choice if you believe your future
> includes Web work.
>
> -Dave
> (Any statements made above are mine, and mine alone.)
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =
>
>

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: FW: Recruiters: Is It Just Me?
Next by Author: Re: FWD: About giving notice...
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameMaker 5.1 versus 5.5
Next by Thread: Re: FrameMaker 5.1 versus 5.5


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads