TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Interview & testing From:Connie Giordano <CPGLJG -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:50:51 EST
Yes, testing is a way of saying "prove it". And I expect you to prove that
you can do what your resume says you can do.
After having been burned by three contractors who claimed experience as a
technical writer, a test has become an absolute necessity. Personality,
skills, experience, rapport, etc., are all things I factor in before I make an
offer, but many peope have perfected interviewing and resume writing, without
having perfected a decent work ethic. After having three writers (who
interviewed well, showed portfolios and seemed eager to learn) waste thousands
of dollars of the company budget, just so I would have to go back and do it
all over, I will not take such a chance again.
Sorry if you think it's an insult to be asked to take a test, but I need to
know how quickly you can grasp what is going on in the application, can you
document it in a coherent fashion, and are you willing to use your own
judgement on style--that tells me you can work independently. And I won't have
to constantly ask you to sit down and work, or to interview a developer about
an application rather than how many baseball games you watched on ESPN last
I once took a job when I was in consideration for three different positions
based on the fact that the company was the only one who asked me to take a
writing test. To me it showed that they respected what the job entailed, and
they wanted to make sure they got someone who could do what was needed.
I took off on a bit of a rant here, and I apologize. There are just too many
folks out there who decide they're writers, but in reality couldn't
communicate a concept or a procdure effectively if their lives depended on it.
And I don't have the time or money to waste finding that out after the fact.