Re: Which do I use? PageMaker? FrameMaker? Quark?

Subject: Re: Which do I use? PageMaker? FrameMaker? Quark?
From: "Porrello, Leonard" <lcporrel -at- ESSVOTE -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:12:00 -0600

Earline,

I think you've almost got it. PageMaker and Quark are better for shorter, _more_ graphic intensive projects. Graphics usually means pictures of various sorts. And for manipulating these, PageMaker and Quark are better tools. For example, PageMaker takes for granted that you'll want to generate press ready, color separated proofs.

Leonard Porrello


-----Original Message-----
From: earline_g [SMTP:earline_g -at- HOTMAIL -dot- COM]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 1999 7:16 AM
To: TECHWR-L; LCPORREL
Subject: Re: Which do I use? PageMaker? FrameMaker? Quark?


The verdict is in:

FrameMaker is the best tool for lengthy technical manuals.

PageMaker and Quark are suited for shorter, less graphic-intensive
documents like brochures and flyers.

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000



Previous by Author: Re: Marketing tech writers and consulting companies
Next by Author: On-Line Help Tools
Previous by Thread: Re: Which do I use? PageMaker? FrameMaker? Quark?
Next by Thread: Books on document management


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads