TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I've noticed that some of you use both Word and Framemaker to create
documents. Being rather new to this field of work, I have yet to use
Framemaker, although I have significant experience working with Word. I
understand that if one works with documents under 200 pages Word is a good
option and if the documentation is over 200 pages Framemaker is preferred.
The problem that I am facing at this moment is that I am working with both
short and long manuals, many being well over the 200 page mark. I would
consider using Framemaker for these documents but I am concerned that the
"look" produced by using these two programs will differ considerably. It is
in my company's interest to have a consistent look to our manuals, whether
they are hard copies or help files.
I am interested in knowing if I can use both these programs without
compromising the consistency of the look.
Since I am a strong supporter of keeping the traffic of this mailing list
to a minimum, I am willing to post a summary of the replies if people send
me their messages directly rather than posting them through the list.