TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>From what little I've read about the subject so far,
>I think these are just concepts that we as technical
>writers already apply to our writing and they
>"ain't that big a deal"! Opinions?
I think the information mapping falls into that class of things I would call
"codified common sense". This is not a criticism. Codified common sense is
often useful, especially when you need to get through a very large amount of
work, with workers of widely differing backgrounds and gifts, and produce
reasonably good results. In a fledgling practitioner or group, the
application of codified common sense tends to both accelerate growth and
limit it. Often this is acceptable. Documentation does not always need to be
brilliant and original. Sometimes it just needs to not suck.
On the other hand, we must never forget that codified common sense is not,
and does not necessarilly lead to the development of, real common sense.
Manager, Technical Communication
OmniMark Technologies Corporation
1400 Blair Place
Canada, K1J 9B8
Email mbaker -at- omnimark -dot- com