TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Frame versus Word From:"Brierley, Sean" <Brierley -at- QUODATA -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 6 May 1999 12:20:23 -0400
It's in the archives. However, three pros and cons (leaving aside the fact
that I researched this and am using FM as a result)
1. Stable: Handles long and numerous numbered lists
2. Stable: Handles numerous graphics, xrefs
3. Stable: High long-term productivity
(Also, goes to PDF well, supports conditional text . . .. Frame is designed
for long, complex, technical docs. It is primarily DTP software and caters
to that audience.)
1. It's not like Word. MS mavens, especially those who use Word poorly, will
find a steep learning curve. Then again, it's not a Windows look and feel,
as evidenced by the on-line help.
2. No macros.
3. Goofy spell checker, no grammar checquer <g>, poor import/export filters.
sean -at- quodata -dot- com
P.S. Please review the archives and make your own list!!!!!!!!!!
>>>From: Suzanne Pyle [mailto:comline -at- GREENNET -dot- NET]
>>>Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 11:55 AM
>>>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>>>Subject: Frame versus Word
>>>If you had to list 3 pros and cons for using Frame over Word 97 for
>>>books that have column layout with rules and graphics, what would you
>>>say is a good argument for using Frame? Both products can accept
>>>graphics, create indices, TOCs, etc., however, I'm trying to persuade
>>>some folks I work with that Frame is a more robust application that
>>>ensures consistencies that Word is not capable of, in my opinion.