Re: Quark Express and FrameMaker

Subject: Re: Quark Express and FrameMaker
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Brierley -at- QUODATA -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:31:32 -0400

The graphics designer should want Quark Express. No surprise there <VBG>.

If you have a high-color marketing piece, newsletter, or small booklet,
consider Quark very carefully.

If you have a greyscale, technical or other document that is long, uses
cross-references and lists (TOC, index, etc.), with many graphics, there is
no choice but FrameMaker.

Good luck.

sean -at- quodata -dot- com

>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: David Thompson [mailto:David -dot- Thompson -at- REALVIZ -dot- COM]
>>>Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 7:34 AM
>>>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>>>Subject: Quark Express and FrameMaker
>>>Hello everyone,
>>>I am trying to convince my company to go for FrameMaker
>>>while a graphic
>>>designer wants Express.
>>>Has anyone got experience of the two that they would like to share?

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=

Previous by Author: Re: Stick with RoboHelp, or upgrade to something else?
Next by Author: Re: Question of clarity
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark Express and FrameMaker
Next by Thread: Re: Quark Express and FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads