Re: Dangling (was RE: "Ability" or "allows" - The answer or "you thou ght so?")

Subject: Re: Dangling (was RE: "Ability" or "allows" - The answer or "you thou ght so?")
From: "Caroline Briggs (Pachaud) (Exchange)" <carolinp -at- EXCHANGE -dot- MICROSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:08:16 -0700

Use this to define the countries where you operate.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brierley, Sean [mailto:Brierley -at- QUODATA -dot- COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 11:08 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Dangling (was RE: "Ability" or "allows" - The answer or "you
thou ght so?")


Actually,

I'd fix it.

"Use this selection to define the countries in which you operate."

I do prefer the "Use this . . ." and "This lets . . ." construction to the
"allows to . . ." variants, but I do not believe your obligation not to
dangle is relieved.

Obviously, as we've seen here many times before, the question is at what
point do we sacrifice the language for clarity. My opinion is that clarity
suffers nought for fixing the dangle.

Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com

>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: John Posada [mailto:jposada01 -at- YAHOO -dot- COM]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 2:04 PM
>>>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>>>Subject: Re: "Ability" or "allows" - The answer
>>>
>>>
>>>And the winner is:
>>>
>>>"Use this selection to define the countries that you
>>>operate in. "
>>>
>>>HEY! I don't even want to HEAR about that dangling
>>>participle. :-)
>>>
>>>Thanks for the help, guys.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>===
>>>John Posada


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: API documentation
Next by Author: sentence case
Previous by Thread: Job: Intermediate TW, Fredericton, NB
Next by Thread: Dangling (was RE: "Ability" or "allows" - The answer or "you thou ght so?")


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads